The professional standard for AI mastery

Master your AI.
Command with precision.

Stop guessing and start guaranteeing. Kloddy gives forward-thinking builders the structure, safety, and clarity to turn random chats into reliable, high-quality results.

Create your first organization →
kloddy · email-assistant · judge: claude-sonnet-4
## Running evaluation against custom criteria
▸ judge claude-sonnet-4 run email-assistant@v4
accuracy 94/100 ████████████░░ +8 from v3
completeness 91/100 ███████████░░░ +3 from v3
formatting 98/100 █████████████░ +1 from v3
safety 100/100 ██████████████ ✓ pass
critical_failures: 0 threshold: 88 verdict: ✓ PASS
▸ publish email-assistant@v4 --changelog "Improved tone, added length constraint"
✓ Published cost: $0.0023 latency: 1.2s tokens: 1,847
Prompt asset management

Never lose a
great prompt again

Move away from messy chat histories and lost notes. Kloddy treats your ideas as valuable assets that grow and improve over time.

01
🗂️
Organized Workspaces
Group your prompts into clear "Features" within different "Organizations" so you can find exactly what you need in seconds.
OrganizationsFeaturesPrompts
02
🔖
Full Version History
Every change you make is saved with a note on what was updated — in an immutable, always-accessible history.
Immutable logChangelogs
03
↩️
Instant Rollback
If a new change doesn't work out, restore a previous version with a single click. No stress, no data loss.
One-click restoreSafe edits
04
⚡
Side-by-Side Diffs
Easily see the exact text changes between any two versions of your work — character by character clarity.
v2 vs v3Char-level diff
05
🧩
Dynamic Templates
Use {{variable}} syntax to build flexible prompts that handle different inputs without rewriting core instructions.
VariablesReusableFlexible
06
🔍
Always Retrievable
Your best prompts never get buried in a chat window again. Every asset is searchable, organized, and owned by your team.
SearchOwned assets
The judge in your corner

Why settle for
"good enough"?

Kloddy uses advanced AI to evaluate your results based on your personal rules. Define what success looks like — then verify it automatically.

🧑‍⚖️ Evaluation Report
claude-sonnet-4
Scoring Pillars
Accuracy
94
Completeness
88
Formatting
97
Safety
100
Critical Failure Conditions
✓ No hallucinated facts detected
✓ Response meets length constraint
✓ Tone matches acceptance criteria
PASS — All criteria met · threshold 88
Cost
$0.0031
per run
Latency
1.4s
execution
Tokens
2.1k
total used
Detailed reasoning
Don't just get a score — see a step-by-step logic breakdown of why the AI succeeded or failed.
📄 email-assistant · v3 → v4
-Write a professional email responding to
-the customer. Keep it concise.
+Write a warm but professional email in
+under {{max_words}} words. Match the
+customer's tone. Never use jargon.
Context: {{context}}
-Input: {{email}}
+Customer email: {{email}}
+Previous exchanges: {{history}}
// defined variables
max_words = "150"
context = "billing dispute"
email = "I've been charged twice..."
history = "[last 3 messages]"
Model benchmarking

Which model gives you
the perfect answer?

Run your prompt through GPT-4o, Claude, or Gemini simultaneously. Automated verdicts — "No Clear Winner", "Tie", or a decisive champion — based on your criteria.

Prompt / Version
Accuracy
Completeness
Cost/run
Verdict
email-assistant v4claude-sonnet-4 · 2.1k tokens
94
91
$0.0023
Winner
email-assistant v4gpt-4o · 2.3k tokens
89
87
$0.0041
Challenger
code-review v2 vs v3claude-sonnet-4 · version compare
82
88
$0.0018
Tie
summarization v5gemini-1.5-pro · 3.4k tokens
91
93
$0.0031
Winner
Transparency & total control

A behind-the-scenes
look at your AI

Everything safe, traceable, and cost-effective. Invite others, manage roles, and track who changed what — and when.

Audit Log
All events
Publishes
Members
Last 7 days · 42 events
Published email-assistant v4 — "Improved tone, added length constraint"
2 min agosarah@acme.comView diff →
Ran evaluation on code-review v2 · Judge: gpt-4o · Result: PASS (91/100)
18 min agomarcus@acme.comView report →
Saved draft customer-support v6 with 3 variable changes
1 hr agopriya@acme.comView diff →
Invited alex@acme.com to Acme Corp as Editor
3 hr agoadmin@acme.com
Rolled back summarization from v5 → v3 after regression detected
Yesterdaymarcus@acme.comView diff →
Transform trial and error into consistent success

Stop hoping.
Start building.

We turn informal experiments into structured assets. Stop hoping for a better result — start building one.

Create your first organization → See how it works
No credit card required · Works for individuals & teams · Free to start